[DOWNLOAD] "Efficiency, Accountability, and Equity Issues in Title 1 School Wide Program Implementation" by Margaret C. Wang * eBook PDF Kindle ePub Free
eBook details
- Title: Efficiency, Accountability, and Equity Issues in Title 1 School Wide Program Implementation
- Author : Margaret C. Wang
- Release Date : January 01, 2002
- Genre: Education,Books,Professional & Technical,
- Pages : * pages
- Size : 13042 KB
Description
How efficient is Title I, the largest federal educational program in elementary and secondary schools? What is the quality of the Title I services? Has Title I promoted equity in schools among our nation’s low-income areas? To address these important issues, this volume draws on the proceedings of two national invitational conferences, sponsored by the mid-Atlantic regional educational laboratory, the Laboratory for Student Success (LSS) at Temple University Center for Research in Human Development and Education in 1999 and 2000. These conferences aim to provide research-based information on how Title I schoolwide programs affect teaching, learning, and student outcomes and to strengthen cost-benefits in Title I program implementation to assist students in high-poverty schools. The focus of the conferences is particularly timely in view of the upcoming Title I reauthorization and the recently enacted federal Comprehensive School Reform Demonstration (CSRD) initiative.
Discussion at the conferences focused on enhancing our understanding of accountability, efficiency, and equity issues in Title I. More specifically, researchers at the two conferences: (a) highlighted findings from the National Study of Effective Title I Schoolwide Programs; (b) examined the effects of research-based comprehensive reform models in high-poverty schools; and (c) addressed cross-cutting issues such as the productivity of Title I programs, the use of technologies in the classroom, the role of the state in strengthening Title I programs, cost effectiveness of whole school reform, professional development, reading instruction, and parental involvement, which are important parts of the national educational reform agenda.
Leading researchers, policymakers, and practitioners were commissioned to develop preconference papers to serve as a springboard for discussion at the conferences. These papers included an overview of the research base and patterns of governance and conditions that lead to effective implementation of Title I schoolwide programs. The papers were reviewed by conference participants before the conferences and were used to develop next-step recommendations for advancing the implementation of the Title I schoolwide provision.
POLICY CONTEXT
By far, the largest federal program in elementary and secondary education is Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA), which was originally passed in 1965 at the height of the Civil Rights movement and of social reform legislation. Despite several revisions and extensions, ESEA Title I continued to adhere to its original redistributive goal of federal assistance to learning-deficient children from low-income families. As declared in the 1965 Act, ESEA Title I was designed "to provide financial assistance to local educational agencies serving areas with concentrations of children from low-income families to expand and improve their educational programs . . . which contribute particularly to meeting the special educational needs of educationally deprived children" (U.S.C. 1965, § 201).
The 1994 Improving America's Schools Act (IASA) established an ambitious agenda for systemic improvement in schools with a high concentration of students from at-risk backgrounds. The legislation posits the establishment of schoolwide programs to reduce curricular fragmentation and enhance instructional effectiveness for schools as a whole. These expectations are further strengthened by Public Law 105-78, enacted in November 1997 (known as the Obey-Porter legislation), in which Congress appropriated an additional $145 million to support the CSRD program for Year 1 of the 3-year demonstration program.
Although the schoolwide approach to school reform is at the forefront of the national agenda to improve schooling quality for at-risk children, the knowledge base on program effects is sorely lacking (Wong & Wang, 1994; Wang & Wong, 1997). The challenge of maintaining the proper balance betwee